He cares, but if he directly intervened, it would defeat the purpose of giving us Free Will. Most people say, "Why does He let us suffer?" Because the time we have on earth is insignificant compared to eternity, and this is what we must endure to enter His kingdom. Besides, He's not the one who makes us suffer. We do it to ourselves. Free will means he let's us suffer the consequences of our own actions.
 
Then you've got the people who probably make up 95% of "christians" or other religious people who sin every day of the week, go to church on sunday and start again the next week. Can anyone who has replied to this thread speaking as a "true christian" say they dont follow a similar weekly pattern? Or, are you doing like most and having premarital sex (sin), lying to friends/family (sin), having lustful thoughts (sin), etc, etc, etc.?? The flesh is weak, and we all need a divine being to overcome this right? Ah yes the infamous "shroud of toran"...the jury is still out on that one. Nobody has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was in fact the burial cloth of Jesus. Just because thousands have flocked like sheep to look at it doesn’t add any value to this arguement.

On the blind faith thing. Simply believing in something because of a feeling one gets, or because you read a book written by some guy who got his information from sources supporting his ideas....is fishy. I'd rather believe in things that I know to be fact vs. basically a history of uncomfirmed heresay and stories that have been passed down from various accounts of events which may or may not have happenend, and in turn retold, reinvented etc. Ever play the game where you sit in a circle of people, one guy starts the game by saying a phrase such as "Bob eats ham, eggs and bacon every morning then reads the wall street journal, mainly the sports colum"...then whispers it into the ear of the guy next to him? By the time the story gets down to the last person, at least a few words have been misconstrued and the story is at least partially different than it was when started. Could you imagine trying to record what may have started as accurate details of a given event in world history thousands of years before modern more accurate means of record keeping came about, and expecting the same account of the event to be accurately told centuries later? Especially when it was first told in one or more languages, then reinterpreted into other languages with bits and pieces of the story inevitably lost along the way as it was passed down along the generations?

Bible nuts pride themselves on believing in things that are hard to believe in. They think god will bless them for that. Go get your damn bible for the following, go on go get your goddamned bible!

If you want history and FACTS from the bible you’re pretty screwed. Take the book of genesis for example. In the FIRST chapter, god creates Adam & Eve at the same time. In the second chapter of genesis, god creates Adam, Adam carries on by himself for a while naming the things in gods’ creation...the animals, invents pizza, etc. Then one day Adam gets lonely and comes to god about it. God then says to Adam basically, ok I’ll provide you with a mate, plucks one of Adams’ ribs sprinkles some magic dust over it and suddenly there’s Eve. Two separate stories in the same book of the bible? Hmm. Is this a case of two different people telling two different stories of the same idea in the holy book? Word of god vs. word of man. I’ve actually asked a pastor about this conflicting story situation here. He basically said something like “oh well that’s just two different versions of the same event.” Ok, I’ll play along. But don’t go and tell me in your next breath that I should take the bible literally word for word....or when it says such and such happened, it really happened.

The “great flood” in Genesis 6: 11-13. “Noah” supposedly grabbed TWO each of approximately 10 BILLION different species of life on the planet from all the different parts of the world on ONE boat. Are we speaking figuratively again here or literally?? Again, how is a book that contains so much fiction mixed with “fact” supposed to be taken literally, as so many people seem to take it?? More likely the flood story is based on a factual event that took place somewhere around the Euphrates river. According to archaeological material I’ve read and shows I’ve seen on the History channel. Sometime around 2900 B.C. there was a storm that lasted for about six days (not 40), the river rose about 22 feet, lotsa people died....hey...natural disasters happened back THEN TOO?? Anyway, one of the survivors was a local Sumarian king named something like Zeasutra (doesn’t look too close to “Noah”), who bought a big boat, road the flood down stream, into the Persian Gulf where he ran aground, thankful for surviving he made a sacrifice on a hill and lived happily ever after. Not coincidentally similar stories have been recorded in other parts of the world throughout history. Any time mankind perseveres over natural disaster, or great strife somebody tells a story about what happened.

Exodus 14: 22-31 Moses and The Red Sea (Parting Thereof) one of my favorite fables from the bible....also spouted as fact. Thousands of Jews were supposedly enslaved by an Egyptian pharoah....no actual historical accounts of any great numbers of Jewish slaves being held in Egypt by the way, anywhere besides the bible. Moses supposedly comes to this pharoah, says “let my people go”. Mr P. Says “no” to Moses, and god supposedly lets loose 10 “plagues” on Egypt.

1) All waters in Egypt “turn to blood”, and all the fish die.
2) Frogs infest Egypt
3) Lice cover man and beast.
4) Clouds of insects attack. (Little Hitchcock-ish eh?)
5) Livestock wiped out by disease.
6) All Egyptians covered in boils.
7) Thunder, hail, fire
8) Locusts
9) Darkness for three days
10) First born of every Egyptian child dies. (There’s a KIND god.!)

Mr. P finally caves, lets Moses and the Jews free, Moses and crew wonder around in the deserts of Egypt for 40 YEARS, (leaving behind no archaeological evidence...thousands of people...40 years, food, pottery, bodies surely, etc) walk to the red sea ...which is about 50+ miles wide and who knows how deep, and he parts it, he and his people walk through the parted sea. Right. I’ve heard it said that once again this is not a LITERAL story...rather a parable/metaphor/even so far as a misinterpretation ....where the “red sea” is actually supposed to be “reed sea” or “sea of reeds”...LOL, in other words the defense being (once again in a book spouted by so many bible thumpers as the word of god and FACT)....they merely walked across a low marshy area vs. an actual parted SEA. Ok, so where’s the “miracle” in that? If there was no miracle....why such an elaborate story??

New Testament time. Jesus, did he exist? (Jesus Christ!) Even in the community of more religious people...religious archeaologists/historians who study the bible and supposed history, there are skeptics. There are in fact historical records, recorded in Rome even of an actual guy by the name of Jesus around the time he was supposed to have lived. Facts are facts though. Just because the guy or A guy named Jesus lived around the time the bible says he did....doesn’t mean he was in fact a divine person, or the son of a god. There were in fact MANY “messiahs” around the same time period. One in fact named something like “Apelonious” of a place called Tianna. Claimed by his followers to be able to heal the sick, raise the dead, walk through walls and buildings; he was also persecuted for his beliefs, brought to trial, crucified and later ascended to heaven and then returned to his followers several days later. Hmm...not the Jesus story, but in fact a very similar one. Hmm. In fact some of the same “miracles” of days gone by supposedly performed by Jesus can be seen being performed by some of these more extreme evangelical types on their money making telethons. Lame people (crippled) being made to walk, eye problems being cured, etc. Ok, so Jesus lived he probably died...I mean he was at least somewhat human right? So what really happened after he died? (Jesus 2, the Revenge) Believers often cite the “resurrection” side of the story with the fact that there was a tomb found in the region where Jesus supposedly lived, and died....and it was empty when archaeologists found it! Ok, you take a dead body and wrap it in the traditional manner of the day (in linen cloth), and leave it basically in the open. Couple thousand years go by, not even bones will be left.

Just some more food for thought. Fish and bread for the masses. Heavens please dont take everything I've just typed here as literal fact, even though I did spend a bit of time doing my homework. Remember, just because you read something that someone else read because someone else read it after hearing it was a good read doesnt mean it is in fact worth reading. Or just because millions of people have believed something to be right, does not mean it is always right. History both past and present has countless examples (holy crusades, muslim extremists, HITLER, wars, etc) of countless millions of real living, breathing fellow humans dying or being slaughtered in the name of whatever a certain group thought was right. For christ sakes, if we still thought the earth was flat, how sili would that be?
 
Andithilion said:
He cares, but if he directly intervened, it would defeat the purpose of giving us Free Will. Most people say, "Why does He let us suffer?" Because the time we have on earth is insignificant compared to eternity, and this is what we must endure to enter His kingdom. Besides, He's not the one who makes us suffer. We do it to ourselves. Free will means he let's us suffer the consequences of our own actions.

Free will? Millions of children dying annually in third world countries....where's the free will there? 25 million people dying of influenza after World War 1, where's the free will? The thousands of people dying most recently in New Orleans...many of them children....where's the free will there? Dont even come back with the "it's gods will" b.s. I'm sorry, but I wont buy the lame examples of it being "gods' will" or what we have to suffer here on earth to get to heaven crap. Why are christians, or people "fortunate" enough to find religion/god the only ones worthy of gods' presence in heaven, while the rest who may not have ever even had the 'grace' of being exposed to "the word" are condemned? Yea, god loves everyone.
 
The obviously died for a reason, maybe God didn't control that, maybe he did, if they would have stayed alive after they got ill, they would have suffered, God doesn't want people to suffer, God loves everyone equally.
 
stillwantmore said:
Then you've got the people who probably make up 95% of "christians" or other religious people who sin every day of the week, go to church on sunday and start again the next week. Can anyone who has replied to this thread speaking as a "true christian" say they dont follow a similar weekly pattern? Or, are you doing like most and having premarital sex (sin), lying to friends/family (sin), having lustful thoughts (sin), etc, etc, etc.?? The flesh is weak, and we all need a divine being to overcome this right? Ah yes the infamous "shroud of toran"...the jury is still out on that one. Nobody has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was in fact the burial cloth of Jesus. Just because thousands have flocked like sheep to look at it doesn’t add any value to this arguement.

On the blind faith thing. Simply believing in something because of a feeling one gets, or because you read a book written by some guy who got his information from sources supporting his ideas....is fishy. I'd rather believe in things that I know to be fact vs. basically a history of uncomfirmed heresay and stories that have been passed down from various accounts of events which may or may not have happenend, and in turn retold, reinvented etc. Ever play the game where you sit in a circle of people, one guy starts the game by saying a phrase such as "Bob eats ham, eggs and bacon every morning then reads the wall street journal, mainly the sports colum"...then whispers it into the ear of the guy next to him? By the time the story gets down to the last person, at least a few words have been misconstrued and the story is at least partially different than it was when started. Could you imagine trying to record what may have started as accurate details of a given event in world history thousands of years before modern more accurate means of record keeping came about, and expecting the same account of the event to be accurately told centuries later? Especially when it was first told in one or more languages, then reinterpreted into other languages with bits and pieces of the story inevitably lost along the way as it was passed down along the generations?

Bible nuts pride themselves on believing in things that are hard to believe in. They think god will bless them for that. Go get your damn bible for the following, go on go get your goddamned bible!

If you want history and FACTS from the bible you’re pretty screwed. Take the book of genesis for example. In the FIRST chapter, god creates Adam & Eve at the same time. In the second chapter of genesis, god creates Adam, Adam carries on by himself for a while naming the things in gods’ creation...the animals, invents pizza, etc. Then one day Adam gets lonely and comes to god about it. God then says to Adam basically, ok I’ll provide you with a mate, plucks one of Adams’ ribs sprinkles some magic dust over it and suddenly there’s Eve. Two separate stories in the same book of the bible? Hmm. Is this a case of two different people telling two different stories of the same idea in the holy book? Word of god vs. word of man. I’ve actually asked a pastor about this conflicting story situation here. He basically said something like “oh well that’s just two different versions of the same event.” Ok, I’ll play along. But don’t go and tell me in your next breath that I should take the bible literally word for word....or when it says such and such happened, it really happened.

The “great flood” in Genesis 6: 11-13. “Noah” supposedly grabbed TWO each of approximately 10 BILLION different species of life on the planet from all the different parts of the world on ONE boat. Are we speaking figuratively again here or literally?? Again, how is a book that contains so much fiction mixed with “fact” supposed to be taken literally, as so many people seem to take it?? More likely the flood story is based on a factual event that took place somewhere around the Euphrates river. According to archaeological material I’ve read and shows I’ve seen on the History channel. Sometime around 2900 B.C. there was a storm that lasted for about six days (not 40), the river rose about 22 feet, lotsa people died....hey...natural disasters happened back THEN TOO?? Anyway, one of the survivors was a local Sumarian king named something like Zeasutra (doesn’t look too close to “Noah”), who bought a big boat, road the flood down stream, into the Persian Gulf where he ran aground, thankful for surviving he made a sacrifice on a hill and lived happily ever after. Not coincidentally similar stories have been recorded in other parts of the world throughout history. Any time mankind perseveres over natural disaster, or great strife somebody tells a story about what happened.

Exodus 14: 22-31 Moses and The Red Sea (Parting Thereof) one of my favorite fables from the bible....also spouted as fact. Thousands of Jews were supposedly enslaved by an Egyptian pharoah....no actual historical accounts of any great numbers of Jewish slaves being held in Egypt by the way, anywhere besides the bible. Moses supposedly comes to this pharoah, says “let my people go”. Mr P. Says “no” to Moses, and god supposedly lets loose 10 “plagues” on Egypt.

1) All waters in Egypt “turn to blood”, and all the fish die.
2) Frogs infest Egypt
3) Lice cover man and beast.
4) Clouds of insects attack. (Little Hitchcock-ish eh?)
5) Livestock wiped out by disease.
6) All Egyptians covered in boils.
7) Thunder, hail, fire
8) Locusts
9) Darkness for three days
10) First born of every Egyptian child dies. (There’s a KIND god.!)

Mr. P finally caves, lets Moses and the Jews free, Moses and crew wonder around in the deserts of Egypt for 40 YEARS, (leaving behind no archaeological evidence...thousands of people...40 years, food, pottery, bodies surely, etc) walk to the red sea ...which is about 50+ miles wide and who knows how deep, and he parts it, he and his people walk through the parted sea. Right. I’ve heard it said that once again this is not a LITERAL story...rather a parable/metaphor/even so far as a misinterpretation ....where the “red sea” is actually supposed to be “reed sea” or “sea of reeds”...LOL, in other words the defense being (once again in a book spouted by so many bible thumpers as the word of god and FACT)....they merely walked across a low marshy area vs. an actual parted SEA. Ok, so where’s the “miracle” in that? If there was no miracle....why such an elaborate story??

New Testament time. Jesus, did he exist? (Jesus Christ!) Even in the community of more religious people...religious archeaologists/historians who study the bible and supposed history, there are skeptics. There are in fact historical records, recorded in Rome even of an actual guy by the name of Jesus around the time he was supposed to have lived. Facts are facts though. Just because the guy or A guy named Jesus lived around the time the bible says he did....doesn’t mean he was in fact a divine person, or the son of a god. There were in fact MANY “messiahs” around the same time period. One in fact named something like “Apelonious” of a place called Tianna. Claimed by his followers to be able to heal the sick, raise the dead, walk through walls and buildings; he was also persecuted for his beliefs, brought to trial, crucified and later ascended to heaven and then returned to his followers several days later. Hmm...not the Jesus story, but in fact a very similar one. Hmm. In fact some of the same “miracles” of days gone by supposedly performed by Jesus can be seen being performed by some of these more extreme evangelical types on their money making telethons. Lame people (crippled) being made to walk, eye problems being cured, etc. Ok, so Jesus lived he probably died...I mean he was at least somewhat human right? So what really happened after he died? (Jesus 2, the Revenge) Believers often cite the “resurrection” side of the story with the fact that there was a tomb found in the region where Jesus supposedly lived, and died....and it was empty when archaeologists found it! Ok, you take a dead body and wrap it in the traditional manner of the day (in linen cloth), and leave it basically in the open. Couple thousand years go by, not even bones will be left.

Just some more food for thought. Fish and bread for the masses. Heavens please dont take everything I've just typed here as literal fact, even though I did spend a bit of time doing my homework. Remember, just because you read something that someone else read because someone else read it after hearing it was a good read doesnt mean it is in fact worth reading. Or just because millions of people have believed something to be right, does not mean it is always right. History both past and present has countless examples (holy crusades, muslim extremists, HITLER, wars, etc) of countless millions of real living, breathing fellow humans dying or being slaughtered in the name of whatever a certain group thought was right. For christ sakes, if we still thought the earth was flat, how sili would that be?

Wow, Stillwantmore, you really wrote a book! Trouble is, you didn't do your homework. Sorry to tell you that your arguements are very weak. I don't like these type of forum pages because often they become personal not neutral.

There is history to prove the bible to be true. The copies we have are accurate and they have been proved accurate over the years. As you said, just because someone says something or writes something doesn't make it so. Thus, because you or I write something doesn't make it so. Your statments have been researched from your prospective and you believed what someone wrote. You followed their arguements and debates and wrote as if they were telling your the truth. You, undoubtedly, believed them and thus wrote and write as if they were truth. Unfortunately, They didn't tell you the truth and so now you are believing what they told you. It would take a long time to write out what is the truth and go through these points of yours item by item.

My question is: Do you want answers? If you do, I will take time and answer every one of your questions and objections. If you are just blowing smoke then it would not be worth my time or yours. Unfortunately much of what is written is biased by churchy stuff that is not accurate or even close. Just because it is religious or so called, doesn't make it so. One example that you mentioned is the Shroud of Turin. Of course it is a fake. It is a religious hocus pocus. Anyone that knows anything knows that is true. So, we give you that one. What does that prove. Nothing. Just that a bunch of people run around spouting about this cloth that was supposed to be the one they wrapped Jesus in....when it wasn't an no evidence really shows it was.

I throw this back to your court. For the record, I respect you highly in the Penis Enlargement field. You have helped me greatly and I am thankful for all you do and have done. Thanks for listening. GS
 
GS, I'm curious how you go about finding "truth" in your view (ie. epistemology).

You state the Bible is true, what do you mean by this?
 
I would imagine there are thousands of things in our past that left no archeological proof behind them. Nature is a very destructive force. The pottery they made thousands of years ago was mostly redware, earthenware, etc. Erosion COULD grind that down to nothing. I believe that the bible, when taken literally, can seem very unbelievable. This is one example of what I think is a good example of the figurative use of the bible (once again, in my opinion):

God said, "Let there be light." - Big Bang

That is what I believe. I believe God was the driving force behind all of the things science has proven over the past few hundred years. And as for free will letting people die of influenza after a war and millions of children starving - it's the world we've created. I never said you get a direct say in your own fate under free will, just that God won't intervene to protect people unless they have a greater purpose that He needs them to serve. I believe people not exposed to the Word in any way are given some sort of chance. Maybe they are reincarnated, maybe not - who knows? As for the "God's will b.s.", I'm afraid I will have to put that one out there. I have no idea why so many innocent people die - God does. Like I've said before, life on this earth is insignificant when compared to the power of the Force. ...to eternity in heaven. (Sorry, it's like 6 am). It's not about suffering to get into heaven, it's more about us living in a harsh world, and having the sense to build in a place that's below sea level just off a coast. I don't think it's that Christians are the only ones 'worthy' of entering heaven; they're no more worthy than anyone else. They're just the ones who found the Light, and were willing to ask Christ for forgiveness.

As for me being a "true" christian and whatnot, I'm an 18 year old virgin, and I plan to wait until I am married to have sex. I do not lie (I loathe lying more than I hate anything else, mainly because of how much I've been lied to), and I try to keep as many sinful thoughts out of my head as possible. But like I've said before - it becomes sin when you dwell on it and let it control you. A thought flashing into your head doesn't make you a sinner. Thinking about it constantly and wanting to do it and thinking about doing it makes you a sinner.

One last thing - Everyone tries so hard to prove that Christianity isn't real. I have never seen a single piece of evidence that is hardcore PROOF that it's false. And I know that's probably impossible - mainly because, if that were the case, this argument would be moot. And I'll also say this - most people on this forum seem very intelligent (You wouldn't figure you'd find that on a penis enlargement forum, would ya?). When you're an intelligent person, it's very hard to believe in God. Your mind doesn't want to wrap itself around something so esoteric and unsolid. It's probably easier for me, since I'm a writer and usually have a pretty elastic perception of things - I'm good at seeing different sides of situations and different points of view. But what it almost always comes down to is this: You can make arguments against something, arguments for something, but in the end, no one will EVER fully agree on which is right. There will always be Christians saying that it's true, and always be athiests (or agnostics) saying it's BS. The most enlightened people, I think, are the third party - The Christians and athiests/agnostics who get along, work together, hang out together, and don't think "THey're wrong, they're wrong, they're wrong" the whole time, letting their religion keep them from knowing one another. The whole point of Christianity is tolerance. People like those fire and brimstone preachers on TV Give us all a bad name.

I don't go to church regularly. I'm lucky if I go 5 times a year. Not because I don't care. The reason I don't go to church is that I'm a mild sociophobe. I'm scared of meeting new people. I feel anxious around them, and don't like public situations when I'm not with a friend. You'll never see me wandering the mall alone unless I go STRAIGHT to what I want to buy, get it, and leave immediately. So, I don't go to church. Another reason I don't go to church is because there are so many fake Christians there. As SWM said. These people also give us a bad name.

I know of a certain guy - he and his brother witness constantly at concerts and shit, random Christianity drives, if you want to call them that (I do it, hehe). They both plan to be preachers when they get older.

One beats his girlfriend.
The other raped his while they were dating.

Sound Christian to you? It sure doesn't to me. I can't even be around these guys without getting angry, which is one reason I don't go to their church. I can't go to another church because there's a couple there, who constantly spout at me, "Go to church more!" and then run off to screw in his truck before/after church, while waiting on her little sister to come out so they can take her for ice cream. Yeah, stupid, yeah, unChristian, yeah, infuriating. I hate it.

Okay, okay, I've been rambling for a bit here. But Let me say this one last thing: This thread will never be conclusive. Ever. It will either die down eventually, or get locked. I just hope we keep it civil (I've seen similar threads in the past become bloody fueds that last for centuries). I've enjoyed writing here so far, but I can honestly say that if it becomes a battle for 'Who's right' instead of just a discussion, I'm out. Because I get caustic and very angry when people start doing the whole "Nuh-uh" thing and trying to prove they're right regardless, and I don't feel like getting in trouble. So...erm...God bless.
 
See my main thing here is, I love a good debate....when there are intelligent answers from both sides coming in...vs just simple minded ones like you might see elsewhere. I'm not trying to totally undermine or insult anyone with my replies, I'm just trying to get reactions because I like to see all the cards....get feedback from all sides. The best way to get that is to get people to think by asking questions that challenge their beliefs, or whatever they may have accepted as truths up until a certain point. I love to investigate things even if I think I already know the answers, or that what someone has told me sounds totally logical, and true beyond doubt. It's like getting a second or third opinion when your doctor says you have something wrong with you vs. simply accepting whatever fate he may dish out.

Andithilion, wow man, I have to say I do have respect for the person you portray yourself to be. Even though this is just anonymous postings on an internet forum you seem like a very cool headed individual with a good head on your shoulders. Most people in your age group are not so level headed, or willing to express your views in such a thought out manner.

German by all means share any information you wish. I'm not saying I'm going to jump on your bandwagon, but again I do enjoy seeing things from all sides possible.
 
I find it hard to believe that an all powerful, all knowing God would make himself known to a few people at the begining of time, and expect the world to believe these few people. Much less condemn a good person to hell for all of eternity just because they didn't get it.

Preachers love to say 'No matter how good you are, you will not enter heaven unless you believe in JC as your savior'. What if you are a wonderful person that does everything possible to find faith in JC, but just doesn't get it in the end? I just don't think God would be that black and white about the rest of eternity.

God: WHAT'S THAT SOLDIER?!?! YOU TRIED!?!?!? WELL TRY NOT TO GET TOO HOT AS YOU BURN IN HELL FOR ALL OF ETERNITY!!!!!
 
stillwantmore said:
Andithilion, wow man, I have to say I do have respect for the person you portray yourself to be. Even though this is just anonymous postings on an internet forum you seem like a very cool headed individual with a good head on your shoulders. Most people in your age group are not so level headed, or willing to express your views in such a thought out manner.

That means a lot to me. :s

Also, to LambdaCalc, if you TRY to find faith all your life, and ask God for forgiveness, then you get it. If you just can't find the faith and still ask for forgiveness, God will save you from your sins. It's not a matter of Faith; God wouldn't keep people out over something they can't control. But if you sincerely want him to save you and accept him as your savior, you go to Heaven.

Also, to SWM - I agree completely. Debating is fun for me, as long as no one lets it get personal (i.e., "Christians are stoopid and they sux"). That's why I wish my school had had a debate team back when I went to my high school...I definitely would have had fun in it.
 
wow andithilion me and you are like twins, except I can't write as good as you can LMAO I am glad everyone handled this in a somewhat controlled manner...it isn't getting out of hand. I think that people over complicate things when they should be explained as easy as you do andithilion. It seems that over time people built up some type of automatic "Anti-God" defense system in they're body. Everyone seems so ready to decline such a truth or such information. They know exactly what to say, like, "There isn't a God...God wouldn't let so many bad things happen to people."....or "there isn't any PROOF that God exists, so I just cannot believe it." People are quick to refuse anything that has to do with God...It really scares me.
 
LambdaCalc said:
I find it hard to believe that an all powerful, all knowing God would make himself known to a few people at the begining of time, and expect the world to believe these few people. Much less condemn a good person to hell for all of eternity just because they didn't get it.

Preachers love to say 'No matter how good you are, you will not enter heaven unless you believe in JC as your savior'. What if you are a wonderful person that does everything possible to find faith in JC, but just doesn't get it in the end? I just don't think God would be that black and white about the rest of eternity.

God: WHAT'S THAT SOLDIER?!?! YOU TRIED!?!?!? WELL TRY NOT TO GET TOO HOT AS YOU BURN IN HELL FOR ALL OF ETERNITY!!!!!

Agreed. I think if Jesus would return, the wealthy and powerful would do anything in their power to prevent this from taking place. Think about it- all monetary wealth would end; the rich would face being equal to the poor. All financial institutions would be holding worthless assesets. Politics and government would indeed come to a drastic halt.The military's reason for existance: war, would dissolve. Suppose Jesus would return, and he's running for President. He might say that all the wealthy would have to place their belongings in a big "poole" to be shared with the more unfortunate. Sure, the poor would love this, but the rich?

If Jesus is returning, the welcome mat is not out.
 
Well, Jesus isn't going to return and run for President. Right before he arrives is what people like to call "apocalypse", which I believe will be a nuclear war. God said in the bible that next time he clears the world, he will use fire, not water. And with the massive build up of nuclear weapons, I think it is pretty obvious where I'm going with this. Basically, the entire world is razed, sinners go to Hell, and people who survive the apocalypse and are Christians remain in His Kingdom on Earth, while those who died go to His kingdom in Heaven. So there's no "Jesus for President" slogans waiting to be had, unfortunately. You got to wonder how many people would vote for him, though...
 
Andithilion said:
Well, Jesus isn't going to return and run for President. Right before he arrives is what people like to call "apocalypse", which I believe will be a nuclear war. God said in the bible that next time he clears the world, he will use fire, not water. And with the massive build up of nuclear weapons, I think it is pretty obvious where I'm going with this. Basically, the entire world is razed, sinners go to Hell, and people who survive the apocalypse and are Christians remain in His Kingdom on Earth, while those who died go to His kingdom in Heaven. So there's no "Jesus for President" slogans waiting to be had, unfortunately. You got to wonder how many people would vote for him, though...

On a similar note, andithilion, who or what do you think the Anti-Christ will be?
 
No clue. However, I think Wal-Mart will be an instrument for him. Think about it: Wal-Mart buys out every other industry, and basically becomes the store. What would be a more convenient way to pay if you always shopped at the same place? Maybe...a chip on the back of your hand? What about on your forehead, to be scanned as you walked out, along with whatever you bought? After a while, you would probably have to have this to purchase things and have commerce, don't you think?

Also...anyone ever heard of the Mark of the Beast?
 
Last edited:
Kraft said:
GS, I'm curious how you go about finding "truth" in your view (ie. epistemology).

You state the Bible is true, what do you mean by this?

Where the bible speaks, it speaks truth. Truth can be proven. The bible is not a science book but when it speaks of science, then it is true, when it speaks of history it is correct. When it speaks of life and morals it is true. We might not agree, that is not the issue. The bible is not like a book where you read one chapter and then the next chapter follows etc. In one chapter it might tell you something then in another chapter, explain or give details about what it said before.

Some things are certainly hard to grasp and you have to search the Bible for the answers, but other things are plain and upfront.

GS
 
stillwantmore said:
Then you've got the people who probably make up 95% of "christians" or other religious people who sin every day of the week, go to church on sunday and start again the next week. Can anyone who has replied to this thread speaking as a "true christian" say they dont follow a similar weekly pattern? Or, are you doing like most and having premarital sex (sin), lying to friends/family (sin), having lustful thoughts (sin), etc, etc, etc.?? The flesh is weak, and we all need a divine being to overcome this right? Ah yes the infamous "shroud of toran"...the jury is still out on that one. Nobody has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was in fact the burial cloth of Jesus. Just because thousands have flocked like sheep to look at it doesn’t add any value to this arguement.

On the blind faith thing. Simply believing in something because of a feeling one gets, or because you read a book written by some guy who got his information from sources supporting his ideas....is fishy. I'd rather believe in things that I know to be fact vs. basically a history of uncomfirmed heresay and stories that have been passed down from various accounts of events which may or may not have happenend, and in turn retold, reinvented etc. Ever play the game where you sit in a circle of people, one guy starts the game by saying a phrase such as "Bob eats ham, eggs and bacon every morning then reads the wall street journal, mainly the sports colum"...then whispers it into the ear of the guy next to him? By the time the story gets down to the last person, at least a few words have been misconstrued and the story is at least partially different than it was when started. Could you imagine trying to record what may have started as accurate details of a given event in world history thousands of years before modern more accurate means of record keeping came about, and expecting the same account of the event to be accurately told centuries later? Especially when it was first told in one or more languages, then reinterpreted into other languages with bits and pieces of the story inevitably lost along the way as it was passed down along the generations?

Bible nuts pride themselves on believing in things that are hard to believe in. They think god will bless them for that. Go get your damn bible for the following, go on go get your goddamned bible!

If you want history and FACTS from the bible you’re pretty screwed. Take the book of genesis for example. In the FIRST chapter, god creates Adam & Eve at the same time. In the second chapter of genesis, god creates Adam, Adam carries on by himself for a while naming the things in gods’ creation...the animals, invents pizza, etc. Then one day Adam gets lonely and comes to god about it. God then says to Adam basically, ok I’ll provide you with a mate, plucks one of Adams’ ribs sprinkles some magic dust over it and suddenly there’s Eve. Two separate stories in the same book of the bible? Hmm. Is this a case of two different people telling two different stories of the same idea in the holy book? Word of god vs. word of man. I’ve actually asked a pastor about this conflicting story situation here. He basically said something like “oh well that’s just two different versions of the same event.” Ok, I’ll play along. But don’t go and tell me in your next breath that I should take the bible literally word for word....or when it says such and such happened, it really happened.

The “great flood” in Genesis 6: 11-13. “Noah” supposedly grabbed TWO each of approximately 10 BILLION different species of life on the planet from all the different parts of the world on ONE boat. Are we speaking figuratively again here or literally?? Again, how is a book that contains so much fiction mixed with “fact” supposed to be taken literally, as so many people seem to take it?? More likely the flood story is based on a factual event that took place somewhere around the Euphrates river. According to archaeological material I’ve read and shows I’ve seen on the History channel. Sometime around 2900 B.C. there was a storm that lasted for about six days (not 40), the river rose about 22 feet, lotsa people died....hey...natural disasters happened back THEN TOO?? Anyway, one of the survivors was a local Sumarian king named something like Zeasutra (doesn’t look too close to “Noah”), who bought a big boat, road the flood down stream, into the Persian Gulf where he ran aground, thankful for surviving he made a sacrifice on a hill and lived happily ever after. Not coincidentally similar stories have been recorded in other parts of the world throughout history. Any time mankind perseveres over natural disaster, or great strife somebody tells a story about what happened.

Exodus 14: 22-31 Moses and The Red Sea (Parting Thereof) one of my favorite fables from the bible....also spouted as fact. Thousands of Jews were supposedly enslaved by an Egyptian pharoah....no actual historical accounts of any great numbers of Jewish slaves being held in Egypt by the way, anywhere besides the bible. Moses supposedly comes to this pharoah, says “let my people go”. Mr P. Says “no” to Moses, and god supposedly lets loose 10 “plagues” on Egypt.

1) All waters in Egypt “turn to blood”, and all the fish die.
2) Frogs infest Egypt
3) Lice cover man and beast.
4) Clouds of insects attack. (Little Hitchcock-ish eh?)
5) Livestock wiped out by disease.
6) All Egyptians covered in boils.
7) Thunder, hail, fire
8) Locusts
9) Darkness for three days
10) First born of every Egyptian child dies. (There’s a KIND god.!)

Mr. P finally caves, lets Moses and the Jews free, Moses and crew wonder around in the deserts of Egypt for 40 YEARS, (leaving behind no archaeological evidence...thousands of people...40 years, food, pottery, bodies surely, etc) walk to the red sea ...which is about 50+ miles wide and who knows how deep, and he parts it, he and his people walk through the parted sea. Right. I’ve heard it said that once again this is not a LITERAL story...rather a parable/metaphor/even so far as a misinterpretation ....where the “red sea” is actually supposed to be “reed sea” or “sea of reeds”...LOL, in other words the defense being (once again in a book spouted by so many bible thumpers as the word of god and FACT)....they merely walked across a low marshy area vs. an actual parted SEA. Ok, so where’s the “miracle” in that? If there was no miracle....why such an elaborate story??

New Testament time. Jesus, did he exist? (Jesus Christ!) Even in the community of more religious people...religious archeaologists/historians who study the bible and supposed history, there are skeptics. There are in fact historical records, recorded in Rome even of an actual guy by the name of Jesus around the time he was supposed to have lived. Facts are facts though. Just because the guy or A guy named Jesus lived around the time the bible says he did....doesn’t mean he was in fact a divine person, or the son of a god. There were in fact MANY “messiahs” around the same time period. One in fact named something like “Apelonious” of a place called Tianna. Claimed by his followers to be able to heal the sick, raise the dead, walk through walls and buildings; he was also persecuted for his beliefs, brought to trial, crucified and later ascended to heaven and then returned to his followers several days later. Hmm...not the Jesus story, but in fact a very similar one. Hmm. In fact some of the same “miracles” of days gone by supposedly performed by Jesus can be seen being performed by some of these more extreme evangelical types on their money making telethons. Lame people (crippled) being made to walk, eye problems being cured, etc. Ok, so Jesus lived he probably died...I mean he was at least somewhat human right? So what really happened after he died? (Jesus 2, the Revenge) Believers often cite the “resurrection” side of the story with the fact that there was a tomb found in the region where Jesus supposedly lived, and died....and it was empty when archaeologists found it! Ok, you take a dead body and wrap it in the traditional manner of the day (in linen cloth), and leave it basically in the open. Couple thousand years go by, not even bones will be left.

Just some more food for thought. Fish and bread for the masses. Heavens please dont take everything I've just typed here as literal fact, even though I did spend a bit of time doing my homework. Remember, just because you read something that someone else read because someone else read it after hearing it was a good read doesnt mean it is in fact worth reading. Or just because millions of people have believed something to be right, does not mean it is always right. History both past and present has countless examples (holy crusades, muslim extremists, HITLER, wars, etc) of countless millions of real living, breathing fellow humans dying or being slaughtered in the name of whatever a certain group thought was right. For christ sakes, if we still thought the earth was flat, how sili would that be?

Great post SWM, you bring up alot of interesting points.
 
Kal-el said:
Great post SWM, you bring up alot of interesting points.

yes...he does bring up interesting points....I think hes a bit off about the Genesis story however...Im going to have to look that one up. Unless someone here knows it in more detail.
 
Andithilion said:
Well, Jesus isn't going to return and run for President. Right before he arrives is what people like to call "apocalypse", which I believe will be a nuclear war. God said in the bible that next time he clears the world, he will use fire, not water. And with the massive build up of nuclear weapons, I think it is pretty obvious where I'm going with this. Basically, the entire world is razed, sinners go to Hell, and people who survive the apocalypse and are Christians remain in His Kingdom on Earth, while those who died go to His kingdom in Heaven. So there's no "Jesus for President" slogans waiting to be had, unfortunately. You got to wonder how many people would vote for him, though...

Dude, that was simply a "hypothetical situation". I don't actually think that he would run for a political office. Besides, how far on the political ladder do you think he would go with slogan's like "love your enemy?" And I don't think the Vatican would place all their riches at his disposal in a hurry.
 
Back
Top Bottom