Wow.
Never did I say that anyone who denies God believes themselves to be omnipresent or omniscient.
I said they would have to be in order to prove it thus the contradiction that is atheism.
Nor did the argument lend itself to the thought that I believe he who denies God then is calling themself God.
That is a total misrepresentation of the argument.
The benefit of doubt should be given even if you're hostile to my point of view.
I made it quite clear.
Atheism does not say it doesn't know if God exists or not, nor does it state that it can't be known, it states matter of fact that God does not exist.
To be able to deny the existence of God you would have to be God being all knowing and everywhere at once.
If you are not all knowing and let's say know 90% of everything there is to know about everything in the universe, (no one would even claim that) then it is possible that God exists within the 10% of what you don't know.
Also you would have to be able to be every place, everywhere in the universe at the same time because it could be even if you were able to be most of everywhere in the universe God could be in the place you're not.
That is why to state categorically that God does not exist you would have to have the attributes of God to know without doubt that He does not exist.
I think it's quite simple and that's why I chose it.
A child can't miss it.
That is why my argument with Bazooka Joe started when I called atheism pseudo intellectualism. He didn't like it but he likes to attack my faith.
Somehow he feels justified but that is his personal bias.
That's why now after his last response he was not just some poor guy giving his opinion and a hyper Christian got all bent out of shape.
He was attacking from the beginning and didn't like his belief system being challenged feeling it is justified to challenge the Christian belief system but his is beyond reach.
He has no answers so he attacks. They may be rude but do little to refute only an attempt to intimidate.
He asked me for proof and I gave him proof.
If he wants to change his world view to agnosticism then we're rapidly making progress in the right direction.
But if you want to hold to a world view that states God does not exist then there's no way out, you're stuck with it.
Never did I say that anyone who denies God believes themselves to be omnipresent or omniscient.
I said they would have to be in order to prove it thus the contradiction that is atheism.
Nor did the argument lend itself to the thought that I believe he who denies God then is calling themself God.
That is a total misrepresentation of the argument.
The benefit of doubt should be given even if you're hostile to my point of view.
I made it quite clear.
Atheism does not say it doesn't know if God exists or not, nor does it state that it can't be known, it states matter of fact that God does not exist.
To be able to deny the existence of God you would have to be God being all knowing and everywhere at once.
If you are not all knowing and let's say know 90% of everything there is to know about everything in the universe, (no one would even claim that) then it is possible that God exists within the 10% of what you don't know.
Also you would have to be able to be every place, everywhere in the universe at the same time because it could be even if you were able to be most of everywhere in the universe God could be in the place you're not.
That is why to state categorically that God does not exist you would have to have the attributes of God to know without doubt that He does not exist.
I think it's quite simple and that's why I chose it.
A child can't miss it.
That is why my argument with Bazooka Joe started when I called atheism pseudo intellectualism. He didn't like it but he likes to attack my faith.
Somehow he feels justified but that is his personal bias.
That's why now after his last response he was not just some poor guy giving his opinion and a hyper Christian got all bent out of shape.
He was attacking from the beginning and didn't like his belief system being challenged feeling it is justified to challenge the Christian belief system but his is beyond reach.
He has no answers so he attacks. They may be rude but do little to refute only an attempt to intimidate.
He asked me for proof and I gave him proof.
If he wants to change his world view to agnosticism then we're rapidly making progress in the right direction.
But if you want to hold to a world view that states God does not exist then there's no way out, you're stuck with it.