Hard to say. I don't know why they refer to it as a "Medical Extender". Too many of these device makers claim 'medically approved'. The fact is: no urologist is going to recommend any of these devices to anyone except under a few extreme circumstances. The American Board of Urologists does not (and will never) support the idea of penis enlargement except for extreme cases such as micro-penis or other ailments. (A smaller than average penis has never been considered a medical condition: so "if it ain't broke, why break it?" is their attitude.)
 
This was the way they got medical approval, becoming a tool for peyronies. Does it work, I would say yes but it would take longer than doing erect work for correction.
 
Well I was just wondering about it. It does say there were increases in length and girth throughout the study so it would be a medical study which actually shows the penis can be grown. I know they use the extenders for when men get the operation for lengthening. I think it's done so the ligament doesn't re-attach rather than to actually increase the size of the cock.
 
The ligament isn't usually fully cut. it's weakened. The extender can then have a greater influence on it and it helps to prevent natural shrinkage from scar tissue which would be typical when a ligament is damaged. Understand that *any* continuous force on the penis will cause it to grow in response.
 
Steady;397220 said:
I know they use the extenders for when men get the operation for lengthening.

The reason tehy send them home with an extender is because the surgery does not bring gains. They are hedging their bets by using natural penis enlargement, the very thing they say does not work, to make their surgeries appear to have worked. Can someone say HYPOCRISY?
 
Thanks for clearing that up guys. I thought they cut the ligament through completely. I guess if they did that your dick would be pointing straight down to the ground all the time...lol. Can you say pogo stick? Tripod? (Well for you long dick guys here..)
 
Back
Top Bottom