Getting gains out of 'inner penis'

FullBloodArab

Active member
Registered
Joined
Nov 9, 2018
Messages
174
The inner penis or the inner tunica etc, we don't have to dicuss the names because the efficacy is what is important:

In my opinion:

PE 'gain distance area' depends on where the grip is. In hanging and extending, and the rest of exercises, where the 'grip structure' is near the glans, this will create (most) gains in the shaft area's. (The red line)

(I'm talking all flaccid exercises btw)

If the grip is made at the base, and the penis is bend or twisted (everyone has a name for this exercises, again we are not looking for names) the twist or bend is ONLY to not let the grip slip. The rest of the shaft should be left alone with no pressure etc

Then when the grip is made (by hands or device) and stays at that point and it is pulled/stretched then this will create (most)gains in the black area. The stretch or pull has a small area to pull. It is not like stretching at the glans obviously where u can create a stretch as much as you penis length. This stretch can maybe stretched/pulled 1inch max.

But the (inner) tunica will suffer as much as the (shaft)tunica does with other exercises.

Does anybody agree with this? and did someone experienced the base exercises and has an opinion that this gain didn't came from the shaft?

I think that if someone has done the extending or hanging or anything that has to do with the glans grip, and experienced an annoying plateau (after 1 year or more of course, keeping as much as possible dedicated that you could gain more gains, so not after 6 months and then thinking you hit a 'shaft' plateau ) that this person should attack the black line and figure out how to gain from this area.

Because the tunica didn't stop at the pubic bone (symphysis). It goes inches beyond. And the glans grip didn't reach this gain distance as this reaches the distance of the shaft (or not as much)

So the (micro)damage that is the essential thing in gaining, can be created (and more targeted) beyond the symphysis , than the glans grip exercise does.

It's not that the inner penis comes out of your body and that these created the length gain.

It's the repair (just like the gains on the shaft created length) that has the gains coming (it has grown, not something that has appeared because it always was hidden there (buried penis). The buried penis can be solved by fat loss of that area (fat pad or panniculus in medical terms) or by surgery. But still that can be done after the inner PE also, so the created inner PE gains are not involved in this.

The bend has to be as near at the symphysis as possible and this can only be created by a grip that is not as width. As wide as you thumb for example so that the bend can be created directly after that. The bend is made near the base shaft (as near as possible) let's say a maximum of 2inches length of non bone pressed. If the bend can be made before that then you should be able to target the tissue from that on to beyond the pubic symphysis. The black line through the penis is where the grib bend should occur approximately.

The skin of the shaft should be retracted as much as possible and gathered at the base before the grip, so that when the bend occurs you will not end up stretching your pubic skin, otherwise this would make the inner tunica unharmed.

And there must be a 'bend' because let's say someone thinks to attache the extender at the base,this of course wil stretch you skin and now the grip is at the glans again, so the bend mus occur so the grip stays at that place to reach that damage distance that is not seen by eye.

Hope you folks understand
 

Attachments

  • 2019-01-06 23.22.58.png
    2019-01-06 23.22.58.png
    273.3 KB · Views: 13
Last edited:
I know my opinion goes against the typical forum "science", but I think the entire penis and ligaments get stretched over time. Some areas 'may' get more or less stretched at different times or with different techniques, but it all eventually has to stretch.
 
I know my opinion goes against the typical forum "science", but I think the entire penis and ligaments get stretched over time. Some areas 'may' get more or less stretched at different times or with different techniques, but it all eventually has to stretch.
I agree! Why would that go against others.

It's the right thing to say that the damage can occur on the whole thing. As well as length and girth.

That is the only scientific fact (what is published) that is behind the tunica gains.

It can't occur because of chemicals or pills or drinks or exercises (massages) that don't create damage.
 
Right. Controlled, repeated tension applied to tissue is why this stuff works. Similar, but not exactly like gauging earlobes, or using traction cages to extend arms and legs.
 
The closer you grip to the base, the less tension placed on the shaft above the grip, so the 'pull' would be concentrating at the point of the 'grip' and below. Does that make sense? If one were to grip as close to the glans as possible, the entire shaft would be under tension (inner/outer, the whole enchilada)
 
The closer you grip to the base, the less tension placed on the shaft above the grip, so the 'pull' would be concentrating at the point of the 'grip' and below. Does that make sense? If one were to grip as close to the glans as possible, the entire shaft would be under tension (inner/outer, the whole enchilada)
Yes that makes sense. And it should.

The force or stretching or pulling (or maybe someone figures out another method) should be targeting the tissue 'before' the grip down to the inner.

That could be that you put your finger (underor above your penis) the space between the grib/bend and the pubic and tilt your penis a bit for a 'second bend' or a second 'bow'.

I think there are several ways people can find different methods with the same target.

Me myself ill try to work that out but after the plateau from the glans to the base is reached and exhaust. And thats a long journey. Otherwise I do to much exercises and that can be a lot of work, sometimes people stop completely when there is to much work created.
 
Last edited:
The closer you grip to the base, the less tension placed on the shaft above the grip, so the 'pull' would be concentrating at the point of the 'grip' and below. Does that make sense? If one were to grip as close to the glans as possible, the entire shaft would be under tension (inner/outer, the whole enchilada)
And also its right that a glans stretch is stretching the entire shaft obviously but this seems only by perception (only by view) But not as much as you go further down internally.

For example

I'm extending above 2000g for 1,5hours and I can feel from minute 1 to minute 90 very closely through the penis with my fingers and examen, and i can feel the veins and tissue etc getting stretched and pressurized etcetera more at the glans down.

This activity that I feel is lost when I go towards the base and beyond the base it's feels like a difference of 50% activitie versus mishaft to glans activitie. .


I don't think the glans attachment extender (or glans grip hanging/stretching ) creates damage in the inner tunica. I think and I feel that this comes from shaft gain mostly (the red line)
 
Last edited:
This makes a lot of sense to me. That’s why I think manuals followed by the use of an extender is probably the most efficient way to achieve length gains.
 
I'd agree as well, the greater force will be immediately below the attachment-point and slowly dissipate as you travel down the shaft. The energy/forces will be absorbed by the closest area to the origin of the 'pull', so maybe adjust the mounting during a 90 minute session...maybe 30 minutes just below the glans, 30 minutes mid-shaft and 30 minutes at the base. PE is very anecdotal, so the more experimentation and creativity backed by reported results help all involved.
Thanks for a thoughtful discussion!
 
I'd agree as well, the greater force will be immediately below the attachment-point and slowly dissipate as you travel down the shaft. The energy/forces will be absorbed by the closest area to the origin of the 'pull', so maybe adjust the mounting during a 90 minute session...maybe 30 minutes just below the glans, 30 minutes mid-shaft and 30 minutes at the base. PE is very anecdotal, so the more experimentation and creativity backed by reported results help all involved.
Thanks for a thoughtful discussion!

It's very hard to flaccid stretch/extend with something attached to midshaft. Because it only touches the skin so the thing will go straight to the glans again. (That's why the bend must occur)

But yes it's true that when this was possible the gains would be targeted from mid to base more then glans all the way to base
 
Have you attempted any hanging in a 'bundled' or 'twisted' state? I found that the chamber didn't slide-up nearly as much
 
Have you attempted any hanging in a 'bundled' or 'twisted' state? I found that the chamber didn't slide-up nearly as much


You mean a bend at midshaft?

I will try to figure that out wants I eventually target the hidden tissue. But this will not be at the midshaft but base.

I think the glans attachment exercises already have targeted this area also, so the normal extending and hanging and stretching has involved the midshaft

So I mean a bit further down
 
I meant a 'twist'
Yeah the twist or bend has to be done. Or anything that can hold the grip for that matter. It's only to hold the grip in place.

With a twist or a bend the hand grip is involved. So the grip is important.

I don't like the name twist if you can reach the same (inner tunica) with a bend. Maybe the twist is good for another gain area
 
Last edited:
The closer you grip to the base, the less tension placed on the shaft above the grip, so the 'pull' would be concentrating at the point of the 'grip' and below. Does that make sense? If one were to grip as close to the glans as possible, the entire shaft would be under tension (inner/outer, the whole enchilada)

Exactly. The higher up you’re gripping the more of that intensity is going to the shaft and ligament the lower you grip the intensity is going to internal structures.
 
to me a 'bend' is more of a fold (like taking the two ends of a towel and bringing them together in the middle) the reason I prefer the 'twist' is that only a 1/4 turn can do the trick and it occurs along the entire axis
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLD
to me a 'bend' is more of a fold (like taking the two ends of a towel and bringing them together in the middle) the reason I prefer the 'twist' is that only a 1/4 turn can do the trick and it occurs along the entire axis

Yeah it's like if you bend at the base your glans is pointing to your stomach. (It goes parallel with your shaft). This also is if someone prefers downwards bend (pointing to your scrotum) shaft on shaft sort of.

I think if someone began (or already does) this exercise, he will surely come op with an advanced method regarding the grip and the direction force along the way.

Just like in any PE, people came with 'weird looking' things, and selfmade helping tools, that are extremely benefiting in gaining flaccid/erect lengt/girth
 
Last edited:
I think if someone began (or already does) this exercise, he will surely come op with an advanced method regarding the grib and the direction force along the way.

That’s how my whole career one in PE. I would start with a basic routine and then I would start to create my own exercises as I went along. Today I’ve created many exercises, routines and tools and this all started with basic PE
 
That’s how my whole career one in PE. I would start with a basic routine and then I would start to create my own exercises as I went along. Today I’ve created many exercises, routines and tools and this all started with basic PE
Exactly you are the proof of the 'weird looking stuff' ☺

(I've used the word grib 100 times above, but this should be grip with a P hahaha I've changed those, sorry guys
 
Very well written posts, impressive knowledge.
 
Back
Top Bottom