I feel that the LOT Theory is really discouraging to people. I definatly think it has way too many holes and has no real proof to back it up. I know that modern Penis Enlargement is still in its early stages and underground, but this theory just doesn't make much sense and should be disregarded entirely.
I just have one simple argument against it. I for instance would have a low LOT according to this theory. However, if I have a low LOT then I'm suppose to have a low exit point right? After shaving my pubic area and actually looking at my penis and its exit point from the lateral view using a mirror I determined that I have a very high exit point. Also, I measured how much internal penis I have running along the front of my pubic bone (from top of exit point to where it begins to curve under) and it's at least an inch and a half. That seems like a lot of internal penis being held in by ligaments.
The fact that someone with a low LOT has a high exit point is enough physical evidence to disprove this theory. Maybe I'm just not understanding the theory correctly.
Discuss.
I just have one simple argument against it. I for instance would have a low LOT according to this theory. However, if I have a low LOT then I'm suppose to have a low exit point right? After shaving my pubic area and actually looking at my penis and its exit point from the lateral view using a mirror I determined that I have a very high exit point. Also, I measured how much internal penis I have running along the front of my pubic bone (from top of exit point to where it begins to curve under) and it's at least an inch and a half. That seems like a lot of internal penis being held in by ligaments.
The fact that someone with a low LOT has a high exit point is enough physical evidence to disprove this theory. Maybe I'm just not understanding the theory correctly.
Discuss.